3,800 preventive maintenance jobs scheduled automatically every month — no coordinator required.
Preventive maintenance exists on paper at most FM operations. The schedule is in a spreadsheet, or in a CMMS that was set up two years ago and has been gradually falling behind. Every month, someone has to review what was missed, what should have been done, and what got bumped by a reactive job. The compliance number — the percentage of PPMs completed on time — is a figure that gets calculated after the fact, usually by a senior engineer on the last Friday of the month. The fundamental problem is that preventive maintenance scheduling is treated as a planning exercise rather than an operational engine. You plan the schedule; then the operation happens; then you measure how well the operation matched the plan. That three-step process is where compliance leaks out. Coreziyo's PPM engine collapses planning and execution into one system. Schedules are generated by rules — asset class, frequency, location, season, and regulator requirement — not by manual entry. The system builds the calendar, assigns the jobs to technicians based on skill and load, and monitors completion in real time. Compliance is not a figure you calculate on the last Friday of the month; it is a number on a live dashboard that the operations manager checks every morning.
Preventive maintenance is only preventive if it actually happens. A schedule that lives in a spreadsheet, or in a planning tool that doesn’t connect to the technician assignment system, will drift. Jobs get bumped by reactive work and never rescheduled. The compliance number drops. The asset ages faster than it should. The reactive backlog grows.
Coreziyo’s PPM engine is designed so that the schedule is not a plan that gets compared to reality — it is reality. The schedule generates the work orders. The work orders go to the technicians. Completion data flows back. Compliance is measured live, not reconstructed.
At 3,800 PPMs a month, this is the difference between an engineering team that manages the schedule and a scheduling engine that manages itself, freeing the engineering team to focus on the exceptions that actually need their judgement.
What you actually get
Rule-based schedule generation
Define PPM rules by asset class, maintenance frequency, and regulatory calendar. The engine generates work orders automatically on the correct date — no manual creation, no missed jobs from a forgotten spreadsheet row.
Calendar visualisation
A monthly and weekly calendar view of all scheduled PPMs by site, discipline, and technician. Operations managers see conflicts and gaps before the week starts, not after it ends.
Conflict detection and resolution
When scheduled volume exceeds available technician capacity on a given day, the system flags the conflict and proposes redistributed dates — keeping the same calendar period, adjusting the load.
Technician load balancing
PPM jobs are distributed across the available team based on trade certification, current reactive workload, and physical location. No technician is overloaded while another is idle.
Seasonal and regulatory rules
Schedule rules account for GCC seasonal patterns — summer HVAC intensity, Ramadan shifts, annual shutdowns — and can be pegged to regulatory inspection calendars for assets with statutory requirements.
Schedule compliance reporting
Live compliance rate by site, asset class, discipline, and technician. Drill from summary to individual missed jobs in one click. The KPI is always current, not reconstructed at month-end.
How it shows up in real operations
The GCC FM operator running Coreziyo auto-schedules approximately 3,800 PPMs every month across 1,000+ buildings. In the summer months, HVAC PPM volume rises sharply — the system recognises the seasonal rule and scales the schedule accordingly, redistributing load across the technician pool without coordinator intervention. Before Coreziyo, the maintenance planning team spent two days each month building the monthly PPM schedule in a spreadsheet, assigning jobs manually, and chasing completion confirmations. Now that time is a live compliance dashboard. The engineering manager sees at 8 am how many PPMs are due today, how many are in progress, and how many are overdue — for every site, for every asset class, in real time. When a reactive job displaces a PPM, the system records the displacement and reschedules within the same calendar period automatically.